Home Testimonials
What Our Customers Say
I have learned a great deal from his mentoring and training in the field of forensic document examination. His ideals and integrity are of the highest level and his pursuit of truth within a document sets a high standard for others to imitate. The field and the judicial system are both fortunate to benefit from his many talents and tenacious curiosity.
Sharon Hampton
Document Examiner and Handwriting Analyst, USAWith this background, credentials and competence, in my opinion it is clear that Mr Khan Sahib should be elevated to NADE Professional Member status, and I am hopeful that he will be so recognized. Mr Khan Sahib is mindful of maintaining high standards and responsibilities with integrity.
J. Wright Leonard
Forensic Document Examiner, PhiladelphiaIn the event of deposit of the amount, the cheque shall be sent for second opinion to the said expert (Mr. Khan Sahib) and on receipt of the expert opinion the case shall be disposed as per law.
Justice P.S. Gopinathan
Hon'ble High Court of KeralaDear Khan…, May I have your permission to suggest your name to the organizer of the trust as a potential trustee for an institution to be organized on graphology etc.
Marcel B. Matley
NADE Parliamentarian, San FranciscoConsidering the mode of comparison made by DW-1 (K Khan Sahib) and the detailed report marked as Ext. D1 I don't find any suspicion on the capacity of the DW1 to give an expert opinion. The report is supported by reason which can be given by a person who has knowledge in handwriting examination.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
Kozhikode, KeralaDear Khan, Thank you for your suggestions and input regarding photographing the documents and differentiating between inks.
Reed Hays
Forensic Document Examiner, HonoluluDear Mr. Khan Sahib, Thank you for your valuable words of wisdom which, I took to account when writing my report on the matter of alleged cut & paste signatures.
Reed Hays
Forensic Document Examiner, HonoluluThe documents in O. S. 179/04 on the file of the Hon'ble Court of the Principal Sub Judge, Palakkad were returned from the State Finger Print Bureau, Thiruvananthapuram stating that a proper study could not be made on the disputed finger prints concerned in this case. On appeal the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala have directed this court to identify the expert who can probably effect a proper comparison on the same materials. It is thereafter that this court has identified your good self as the expert who could undertake the comparison work. Therefore, the concerned documents are forwarded herewith for favour of your consideration and analytical report.